Clinical Content, Evidence & Review Policy

Tom Morgan Physio Solutions publishes physiotherapy, rehabilitation and exercise information for patients and the public. This page explains who writes the clinical content, which sources are used, how material is reviewed and updated, and how free information is kept distinct from paid rehabilitation eGuides.

Who writes and reviews the clinical content?

Clinical rehabilitation content is written and reviewed byTom Morgan, BSc (Hons) Physiotherapy, HCPC-registered Chartered Physiotherapist and CSP member. Author pages and individual clinical articles identify the author and show a review date where appropriate.

The review date means the content has been checked for continued relevance, clarity, safety wording, links and alignment with the evidence sources used. It does not mean that an external organisation has endorsed the page or product unless that is explicitly stated.

What evidence sources are used?

Sources depend on the topic. Where relevant, content is informed by recognised clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, peer-reviewed research and established patient-information organisations. Sources are linked visibly where they are particularly useful to readers and may also be identified in structured page data.

Examples includeNICE guidance,Cochrane reviews,MS Trustand theMS Society. Condition-specific pages may use additional peer-reviewed or professional sources.

How often is content reviewed?

Clinical pages are reviewed when new material is published, when a substantial page update is made, when an important guideline or evidence source changes, or when a correction is needed. Review dates are shown on the principal rehabilitation resources so readers can see when a page was last checked.

A review does not imply that clinical evidence can never change. Readers should still use their own clinician or medical team for current advice that depends on diagnosis, medication, surgery, neurological change or individual risk.

How are corrections handled?

If a factual error, broken clinical source, unclear safety statement or outdated recommendation is identified, the relevant page can be corrected and its review information updated. The aim is to make substantive corrections rather than hide them behind marketing language.

Free information and paid eGuides

The website contains free rehabilitation articles and hubs, including theMultiple Sclerosis Physiotherapy & Exercise Hub, as well as paid digital rehabilitation eGuides. Links to a paid guide are commercial links to a Tom Morgan Physio Solutions product, not independent endorsements.

The centralphysiotherapist-written rehabilitation guide collectionexplains the available guide topics. TheComplete Multiple Sclerosis Physiotherapy & Rehabilitation Guideis a paid digital resource and is clearly identified as such wherever price or purchasing information is discussed.

What the information can and cannot do

Website articles and eGuides provide general education, exercise ideas and rehabilitation information. They cannot diagnose an individual, assess neurological or musculoskeletal status, determine whether a new symptom is a relapse or complication, change medication, or replace individual assessment. Advice from a person’s own surgeon, neurologist, MS team, GP or physiotherapist takes priority.

Commercial independence and claims

Tom Morgan Physio Solutions does not describe a guide as endorsed by the NHS, NICE, MS Trust, MS Society, CSP or another organisation unless a genuine endorsement has been obtained and can be evidenced. Citing or linking to an organisation means its public information or guidance has been used as a source; it does not imply that organisation recommends a Tom Morgan Physio Solutions product.

Questions about the evidence or a page

If a reader believes a clinical page contains an error or an important source has changed, they can contact Tom Morgan Physio Solutions through the website so the content can be reviewed.

Last updated: 26 August 2026.

Tom Morgan Physiotherapist: Qualifications, Clinical Approach and Content Review

Best Diet for Multiple Sclerosis: What Does the Evidence Actually Say?